Bell v. State
365 S.W.3d 653, 2012 WL 1623529, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 610
Opinion
ORDER
Johnnie Bell, Sr., appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. State, 365 S.W.3d 653, 2012 WL 1623529, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 610 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
365 S.W.3d 653 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cole v. SCHREITER CONCRETE, CO.
365 S.W.3d 653 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)