Bell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bell v. State

365 S.W.3d 653, 2012 WL 1623529, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 610

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 9, 2012

DocketED 96585

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 365 S.W.3d 653 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. State, 365 S.W.3d 653, 2012 WL 1623529, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 610 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnnie Bell, Sr., appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnnie Bell, Sr., appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 S.W.3d 653, 2012 WL 1623529, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack