Bell v. State

457 S.W.3d 353, 2014 WL 8106168
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 821
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 10, 2014·No. No. ED 101408·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jimmy Bell (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Movant’s Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence denying Movant’s Rule 29.15 claims for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 457 S.W.3d 353, 2014 WL 8106168 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

457 S.W.3d 353 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.