Cole v. SCHREITER CONCRETE, CO.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cole v. SCHREITER CONCRETE, CO.

365 S.W.3d 653, 2012 WL 1623861, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 630

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 9, 2012

DocketED 97320

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 365 S.W.3d 653 (Cole v. SCHREITER CONCRETE, CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cole v. SCHREITER CONCRETE, CO., 365 S.W.3d 653, 2012 WL 1623861, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 630 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Cole (Claimant) appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge and finding that Claimant’s 1999 accident at work was not a substantial factor in causing his knee and neck conditions and, thereby, denying compensation. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Cole (Claimant) appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge and finding that Claimant’s 1999 accident at work was not a substantial factor in causing his knee and neck conditions and, thereby, denying compensation. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 S.W.3d 653, 2012 WL 1623861, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-schreiter-concrete-co-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack