Bell v. State

768 So. 2d 528, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12094, 2000 WL 1354114
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 723 So. 2d 896
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 21, 2000·No. No. 1D99-4425·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order of the trial court summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief. We reverse and remand the case for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing or to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the appellant’s claim that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to the reason given for the trial court’s sentence departing from the guidelines. See Williams v. State, 581 So.2d 144 (Fla.1991); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Pilkington v. State, 734 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

JOANOS, WOLF, and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 768 So. 2d 528, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12094, 2000 WL 1354114 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

768 So. 2d 528 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
581 So. 2d 144 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Lambert v. State
545 So. 2d 838 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Pilkington v. State
734 So. 2d 1153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)