Bell v. State

731 So. 2d 85, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4345, 1999 WL 186600
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 673 So. 2d 556
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 1999·No. No. 97-02642·Published

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

On the merits we affirm Maurice Bell’s conviction and sentence, but we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written judgment and sentence. See Fenn v. State, 702 So.2d 600 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Notwithstanding the trial court’s dismissal of two counts of attempted murder and one count of shooting into a vehicle, the judgment and sentence reflect convictions on these counts as well as on the single count of attempted first degree murder for which the jury found Bell guilty. On remand the trial court shall delete from the judgment and sentence any reference to counts 2, 3, and 4.

Remanded with directions.

FULMER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 731 So. 2d 85, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4345, 1999 WL 186600 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

731 So. 2d 85 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fenn v. State
702 So. 2d 600 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)