Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bell v. State

Bell v. State

764 So. 2d 5, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15539, 1998 WL 878990
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 673 So. 2d 556 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 9, 1998·No. No. 98-0781·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s revocation of community control and sentence. See Robinson v. State, 689 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). However, while the trial court orally gave its reasons for revoking appellant’s community control, the record contains no written order setting forth the trial court’s reasons for the revocation. Appellee concedes, and we agree, that this must be remanded for the limited purpose of allowing the trial court to enter a written order. See Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Taylor v. State, 681 So.2d 910 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

DELL, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 764 So. 2d 5, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15539, 1998 WL 878990 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

764 So. 2d 5 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watts v. State
688 So. 2d 1018 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Taylor v. State
681 So. 2d 910 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Robinson v. State
689 So. 2d 1147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)