Bell v. State
737 So. 2d 615, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9916, 1999 WL 548639
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 22, 1999·No. No. 97-4509·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the order finding that appellant violated his probation. Because appellant received a split sentence totaling the maximum time available for the underlying second degree felony, the sentence must be corrected to show that appellant is entitled to credit for time spent on probation, as well as credit for time spent in jail awaiting sentencing for the violation of probation.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. State, 737 So. 2d 615, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9916, 1999 WL 548639 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
737 So. 2d 615 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
GTECH v. State Dept. of Lottery
737 So. 2d 615 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)