Bell v. State
642 So. 2d 1113, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8805, 1994 WL 496885
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 14, 1994·No. No. 93-106·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
The appellant appeals from convictions and sentences for three counts of lewd and lasciv[1114]*1114ious act upon or in the presence of a child. Because the appellant’s counsel conceded at oral argument that no prejudice occurred when appellant’s right to counsel was violated by his trial counsel’s exiting the courtroom during the sentencing hearing, we affirm on that issue. We find no merit to the other issues raised, and accordingly affirm the convictions and sentences.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. State, 642 So. 2d 1113, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8805, 1994 WL 496885 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
642 So. 2d 1113 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. State
8 So. 3d 451 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Tyler v. State
710 So. 2d 645 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)