Bell v. State

595 So. 2d 1018, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2394, 1992 WL 41524
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 1992·No. No. 92-00311·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Oliver Bell appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial judge denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing and, in her order, made specific references to attachments from the court file which appear to refute the appellant’s allegations. Unfortunately, the references were not attached to the denial order. We have attempted to supplement the record but the clerk’s office has not been able to locate the referenced attachments.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 595 So. 2d 1018, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2394, 1992 WL 41524 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

595 So. 2d 1018 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power v. State
636 So. 2d 587 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Young v. State
629 So. 2d 1116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Heflin v. State
595 So. 2d 1018 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)