Bell v. State

585 So. 2d 496, 1991 WL 178103
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 13, 1991·No. 91-02607·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

585 So.2d 496 (1991)

Oliver BELL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-02607.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 13, 1991.

PER CURIAM.

Oliver Bell appeals the dismissal of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court dismissed the motion as successive and an abuse of procedure.

When a trial court denies a motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing, rule 3.850 requires the attachment to the order of "that portion of the files and records which conclusively shows that the prisoner is entitled to no relief." The rule does not expressly provide for such attachments when the trial court dismisses a motion after finding that it is successive. Without the attachment of any prior motions filed by the prisoner and other pertinent records in the case, however, this court is precluded from adequately reviewing the order of dismissal. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the attachment of any documents in the record that support the trial court's dismissal. Any party aggrieved by the trial court's subsequent action shall file a notice of appeal within thirty days.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 585 So. 2d 496, 1991 WL 178103 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

585 So. 2d 496 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. State
814 So. 2d 1213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Waterfield v. State
736 So. 2d 735 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Smith v. State
719 So. 2d 1017 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Williams v. State
689 So. 2d 1217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Pryor v. State
625 So. 2d 917 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Ortiz v. State
593 So. 2d 1160 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)