Bell v. State

522 So. 2d 85, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 727, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1000, 1988 WL 21014
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 1988
DocketNo. 87-2267
StatusPublished

This text of 522 So. 2d 85 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. State, 522 So. 2d 85, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 727, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1000, 1988 WL 21014 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order of revocation of community control but reverse the $200.00 cost assessment pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985), as the parties agree that the trial court erred in its imposition of this assessment. As to the costs imposed pursuant to sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes (1985), we remand with direction to the trial court to furnish appellant proper notice and opportunity to object as required under Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 So. 2d 85, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 727, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1000, 1988 WL 21014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.