Ortiz v. State

593 So. 2d 1160, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1294, 1992 WL 25908
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 12, 1992
DocketNo. 91-04196
StatusPublished

This text of 593 So. 2d 1160 (Ortiz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ortiz v. State, 593 So. 2d 1160, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1294, 1992 WL 25908 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Johnny Ortiz appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. The trial court denied the motion as a duplicate motion, but did not attach any documentation from the file to support that determination. Without the attachment of the prior motion, and other pertinent records, this court is precluded from adequately reviewing the appeal. See Bell v. State, 585 So.2d 496 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the attachment of any documents in the record that support the trial court’s order.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. State
585 So. 2d 496 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
593 So. 2d 1160, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1294, 1992 WL 25908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.