Ortiz v. State

593 So. 2d 1160, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1294, 1992 WL 25908
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ortiz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 543 So. 2d 377
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 1992·No. No. 91-04196·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Johnny Ortiz appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. The trial court denied the motion as a duplicate motion, but did not attach any documentation from the file to support that determination. Without the attachment of the prior motion, and other pertinent records, this court is precluded from adequately reviewing the appeal. See Bell v. State, 585 So.2d 496 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the attachment of any documents in the record that support the trial court’s order.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortiz v. State, 593 So. 2d 1160, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1294, 1992 WL 25908 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

593 So. 2d 1160 (Ortiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. State
585 So. 2d 496 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)