Bell v. State

522 So. 2d 85, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 727, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1000, 1988 WL 21014
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1396
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 16, 1988·No. No. 87-2267·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order of revocation of community control but reverse the $200.00 cost assessment pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985), as the parties agree that the trial court erred in its imposition of this assessment. As to the costs imposed pursuant to sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes (1985), we remand with direction to the trial court to furnish appellant proper notice and opportunity to object as required under Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 522 So. 2d 85, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 727, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1000, 1988 WL 21014 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

522 So. 2d 85 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)