Bell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bell v. State

488 So. 2d 119, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1043, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7616

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 453 So. 2d 478 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 1986·No. No. 85-2123·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends on appeal that the trial court erred in failing to give proper credit for time served as a youthful offender. We agree.

The record is clear that defendant was entitled to credit in that regard. See State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla.1978), and Sims v. State, 369 So.2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). He did not receive it.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRÁNK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends on appeal that the trial court erred in failing to give proper credit for time served as a youthful offender. We agree.

The record is clear that defendant was entitled to credit in that regard. See State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla.1978), and Sims v. State, 369 So.2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). He did not receive it.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRÁNK, JJ., concur.

Bell v. State, 488 So. 2d 119, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1043, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7616 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

488 So. 2d 119 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related