Bell v. State
This text of 488 So. 2d 119 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant contends on appeal that the trial court erred in failing to give proper credit for time served as a youthful offender. We agree.
The record is clear that defendant was entitled to credit in that regard. See State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla.1978), and Sims v. State, 369 So.2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). He did not receive it.
Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 So. 2d 119, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1043, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.