Bell v. State

488 So. 2d 119, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1043, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7616
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 1986
DocketNo. 85-2123
StatusPublished

This text of 488 So. 2d 119 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. State, 488 So. 2d 119, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1043, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7616 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends on appeal that the trial court erred in failing to give proper credit for time served as a youthful offender. We agree.

The record is clear that defendant was entitled to credit in that regard. See State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla.1978), and Sims v. State, 369 So.2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). He did not receive it.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRÁNK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sims v. State
369 So. 2d 431 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
State v. Holmes
360 So. 2d 380 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 So. 2d 119, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1043, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.