Beaver v. Beaver

57 S.W.2d 279
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 9, 1933
DocketNo. 1439.
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 57 S.W.2d 279 (Beaver v. Beaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beaver v. Beaver, 57 S.W.2d 279 (Tex. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This case is before the court on motion of appellee to affirm on certificate because of the failure .of appellant to file the transcript within the time provided by law. *280 The record discloses that the trial court rendered final judgment on August 1, 1932. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled on the 24th day of August, 1932, at which time notice of appeal was given. On the 15th day of September, 1932, appellant perfected her appeal by filing the statutory affidavit in lieu of an appeal bond. The time within which the transcript should have been filed in the Court of Civil Appeals expired October 23, 1932. Revised Statutes, article 1839, as amended in 1931 (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 1839). Appellee filed his' motion to affirm on certificate January 17, 1933, during the term to which appellant’s appeal was returnable.

Under the provisions of Revised Statutes, article 1841, thei appellee is entitled to have the judgment of the trial court affirmed. Article 1841, Revised Statutes; 3 Tex. Jur. 737; Scottish Union & Nat. Ins. Co. v. Clancey, 91 Tex. 467, 44 S. W. 482; Snelling v. Security Trust Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 288 S. W. 241; Burton v. Sells (Tex. Civ. App.) 202 S. W. 357; Wagley v. Wagley (Tex. Civ. App.) 1 S.W.(2d) 917; Dandridge v. Masterson, 105 Tex. 511, 152 S. W. 166; Woodfin v. Hulen (Tex. Civ. App.) 13 S.W.(2d) 390.

The motion to affirm on certificate is granted, and the judgment of the trial court affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tunstill v. Scott
182 S.W.2d 734 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1944)
Hooe v. Texas Fire & Casualty Underwriters
151 S.W.2d 310 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Booth v. Renfro
150 S.W.2d 269 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Texas State Life Ins. Co. v. Daiches
149 S.W.2d 172 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Meadows v. Hays
137 S.W.2d 838 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Texas State Life Ins. Co. v. Price
131 S.W.2d 760 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Cameron v. Adams
129 S.W.2d 773 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Texas State Life Ins. Co. v. Adams Funeral Home, Inc.
129 S.W.2d 322 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Seay v. Lindley
128 S.W.2d 98 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Jank v. Clayton
119 S.W.2d 905 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Babb v. Baker
114 S.W.2d 609 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Cleburne Nat. Bank v. Bowers
113 S.W.2d 578 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Draughon's Business College v. Mathis
73 S.W.2d 549 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Farmer v. Fuller
70 S.W.2d 599 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
French v. Smith
70 S.W.2d 588 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Rumfield v. A. J. Rumfield
70 S.W.2d 1119 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Cavanaugh v. Watkins
65 S.W.2d 795 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 S.W.2d 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beaver-v-beaver-texapp-1933.