Rumfield v. A. J. Rumfield

Court of Appeals of Texas

Rumfield v. A. J. Rumfield

70 S.W.2d 1119

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 25, 1934

DocketNo. 1573.

StatusPublished

This text of 70 S.W.2d 1119 (Rumfield v. A. J. Rumfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rumfield v. A. J. Rumfield, 70 S.W.2d 1119 (Tex. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This case is before the court on motion of appellee to affirm on certificate because of the failure of appellant to file the transcript in this court within the time provided by law.

The' record discloses that final judgment was entered by the trial court on July 13, 1933. Motion for new trial was overruled July 15, 1933. The appeal to this court was perfected by the filing of bond on July 27, 1933. The appellant has wholly failed to file in this court a transcript of the proceedings. Under the provisions of Revised Statutes, art. 1841, the appellee is entitled to have the judgment of the trial court affirmed. Beaver v. Beaver (Tex. Civ. App.) 57 S.W.(2d) 279. The appellant concedes this to be true, and agrees that the judgment of the trial court may be so affirmed, and it is so ordered. , .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This case is before the court on motion of appellee to affirm on certificate because of the failure of appellant to file the transcript in this court within the time provided by law.

The' record discloses that final judgment was entered by the trial court on July 13, 1933. Motion for new trial was overruled July 15, 1933. The appeal to this court was perfected by the filing of bond on July 27, 1933. The appellant has wholly failed to file in this court a transcript of the proceedings. Under the provisions of Revised Statutes, art. 1841, the appellee is entitled to have the judgment of the trial court affirmed. Beaver v. Beaver (Tex. Civ. App.) 57 S.W.(2d) 279. The appellant concedes this to be true, and agrees that the judgment of the trial court may be so affirmed, and it is so ordered. , .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 S.W.2d 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rumfield-v-a-j-rumfield-texapp-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack