Farmer v. Fuller

Court of Appeals of Texas

Farmer v. Fuller

70 S.W.2d 599, 1934 Tex. App. LEXIS 385

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 22, 1934

DocketNo. 1634.

StatusPublished

This text of 70 S.W.2d 599 (Farmer v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farmer v. Fuller, 70 S.W.2d 599, 1934 Tex. App. LEXIS 385 (Tex. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This case is before the court on motion of appellee to affirm on certificate because of the failure of appellant to file the transcript' in this’ court within the time provided by law.

*600 The record discloses that final judgment was entered by the trial court on the 21st day of 'September, 10-33, and that appellant’s amended motion for new trial was overruled on the 2Sth day of September, 1933. His affidavit in forma pauperis was filed and approved on the 13th day of November, 1933. The appellant has wholly failed to file a transcript in this court of the proceedings. According to the Revised Statutes, art. 1839, amended (Vernon’s Ann. Oiv. St. art. 1839), appellant’s time to file his transcript expired on the 27th day of November, 19331 Beaver v. Beaver (Tex. Civ. App.) 57 S.W.(2d) 279, and authorities therein cited; Wagley v. Wagley. (Tex. Civ. App.) 1 S.W.(2d) 917. Under the provisions of the Revised Statutes, art. 1841, the appellee is entitled to have the judgment of the trial- court affirmed. Beaver v. Beaver, supra; Woodfin v. Hulen (Tex. Civ. App.) 13 S.W.(2d) 390.

The motion to affirm on certificate is granted, and the judgment of the trial court affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This case is before the court on motion of appellee to affirm on certificate because of the failure of appellant to file the transcript' in this’ court within the time provided by law.

*600 The record discloses that final judgment was entered by the trial court on the 21st day of 'September, 10-33, and that appellant’s amended motion for new trial was overruled on the 2Sth day of September, 1933. His affidavit in forma pauperis was filed and approved on the 13th day of November, 1933. The appellant has wholly failed to file a transcript in this court of the proceedings. According to the Revised Statutes, art. 1839, amended (Vernon’s Ann. Oiv. St. art. 1839), appellant’s time to file his transcript expired on the 27th day of November, 19331 Beaver v. Beaver (Tex. Civ. App.) 57 S.W.(2d) 279, and authorities therein cited; Wagley v. Wagley. (Tex. Civ. App.) 1 S.W.(2d) 917. Under the provisions of the Revised Statutes, art. 1841, the appellee is entitled to have the judgment of the trial- court affirmed. Beaver v. Beaver, supra; Woodfin v. Hulen (Tex. Civ. App.) 13 S.W.(2d) 390.

The motion to affirm on certificate is granted, and the judgment of the trial court affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 S.W.2d 599, 1934 Tex. App. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmer-v-fuller-texapp-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack