Beatty v. State

647 So. 2d 261, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11391, 1994 WL 664101
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 1994·No. No. 94-1277·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.850 motion for post-conviction relief is facially deficient, in that it does not contain all of the information required by rule 3.850(c). See, e.g., Schofield v. State, 641 So.2d 172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The order denying relief is therefore affirmed.

ALLEN, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beatty v. State, 647 So. 2d 261, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11391, 1994 WL 664101 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

647 So. 2d 261 (Beatty v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burchfield v. State
907 So. 2d 614 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)