Beatty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Beatty v. State

602 So. 2d 628, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7822, 1992 WL 153983

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 1992

DocketNo. 92-1572

StatusPublished

This text of 602 So. 2d 628 (Beatty v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beatty v. State, 602 So. 2d 628, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7822, 1992 WL 153983 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order denying his “Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing Regarding Prosecutorial Misconduct.” We dismiss for lack of an appealable order. Appellant’s motion did not seek relief under rules 3.800 or 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and rule 9.140 does not authorize an appeal from the order denying this motion. See Hunter v. State, 583 So.2d 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

DISMISSED.

LETTS and DELL, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order denying his “Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing Regarding Prosecutorial Misconduct.” We dismiss for lack of an appealable order. Appellant’s motion did not seek relief under rules 3.800 or 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and rule 9.140 does not authorize an appeal from the order denying this motion. See Hunter v. State, 583 So.2d 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

DISMISSED.

LETTS and DELL, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

602 So. 2d 628, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7822, 1992 WL 153983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beatty-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack