Beatty v. State
647 So. 2d 261, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11391, 1994 WL 664101
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 29, 1994
DocketNo. 94-1277
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 647 So. 2d 261 (Beatty v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Beatty v. State, 647 So. 2d 261, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11391, 1994 WL 664101 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
Opinion
The appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.850 motion for post-conviction relief is facially deficient, in that it does not contain all of the information required by rule 3.850(c). See, e.g., Schofield v. State, 641 So.2d 172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The order denying relief is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Burchfield v. State
907 So. 2d 614 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
647 So. 2d 261, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11391, 1994 WL 664101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beatty-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.