Baxter v. Baxter

173 A.D. 998
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 173 A.D. 998 (Baxter v. Baxter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baxter v. Baxter, 173 A.D. 998 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred. Minnie Crassne, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. William J. Randall, Respondent.— Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Engels
21 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
In re the Estate of Krup
173 Misc. 578 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 A.D. 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baxter-v-baxter-nyappdiv-1916.