Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Engels

21 A.D.2d 808, 250 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3526
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 21 A.D.2d 808 (Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Engels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Engels, 21 A.D.2d 808, 250 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

In an action arising out of an automobile accident, brought by an automobile liability insurance carrier, as subrogee of a claim of the insured owner of the automobile, for indemnity against the estate and distributees of the deceased driver thereof, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 10, 1963, which: (1) denied their motion for a protective order, pursuant to statute (CPLR 3103), so as to suppress (as allegedly privileged) a certain written statement given by defendant Josephine Engels; and (2) directed that the said defendant Josephine Engels and the defendant Anthony Cava appear for pretrial examination pursuant to a notice theretofore given. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Other considerations aside, it is our opinion that the privilege here asserted was waived when, in compliance with the demand served by defendants’ attorney pursuant to statute (CPLR 3101, subd. [e]), the plaintiff’s attorneys furnished the defendants’ attorney with a copy of the allegedly privileged statement; and when such statement was submitted as an exhibit to the Special Term and as part of the record on appeal to this court (cf. People v. Ryan, 40 Ill. App. 2d 352; Matter of Warrington [State of New York], 277 App. Div. 1076, affd. 303 N. Y. 129; Matter of Krup, 173 Misc. 578; Baxter v. Baxter, 92 Misc. 567, 570, affd. 173 App. Div. 998; Matter of’ Saxl, 27 Misc 2d 658). The pretrial examination of the defendants Josephine Engels and Anthony Cava shall proceed on 10 days’ written notice at the place specified in the order, or at such time and place as the parties may mutually fix by written stipulation. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [41 Misc 2d 49.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buxton v. Ruden
12 A.D.3d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Emons Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
747 F. Supp. 1079 (S.D. New York, 1990)
Bras v. Atlas Construction Corp.
153 A.D.2d 914 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Eigenheim Bank v. Halpern
598 F. Supp. 988 (S.D. New York, 1984)
Nelson v. Greenspoon
103 F.R.D. 118 (S.D. New York, 1984)
Old Homestead Enterprises of Saratoga, Inc. v. Hall
102 A.D.2d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Jakobleff v. Cerrato, Sweeney & Cohn
97 A.D.2d 834 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Goldberg v. American Home Assurance Co.
80 A.D.2d 409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A.D.2d 808, 250 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-mutual-insurance-v-engels-nyappdiv-1964.