Bat- Jac Contracting, Inc. v. New York City Housing Authority

1 A.D.3d 128, 766 N.Y.S.2d 352, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11640
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 1 A.D.3d 128 (Bat- Jac Contracting, Inc. v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bat- Jac Contracting, Inc. v. New York City Housing Authority, 1 A.D.3d 128, 766 N.Y.S.2d 352, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11640 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

[129]*129Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered February 27, 2003, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to file a timely notice of claim, which is expressly made a prerequisite to recovery under the parties’ contract and which is subject to strict construction as a matter of public policy (see A.H.A. Gen. Constr. v New York City Hous. Auth., 92 NY2d 20, 33-34 [1998]). Plaintiffs previous letter notice is not designated as a notice of claim and, in any event, fails to meet the requirements of the contract’s notice provision. Even if the notice defect were to be ignored, plaintiff waived any right to sue for delay damages under the contract. Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate intentional wrongdoing, gross negligence or willful misconduct (North Star Contr. Corp. v City of New York, 203 AD2d 214, 215 [1994]), and its claim is tantamount to an allegation of poor contract administration that is subject to the bar of the exculpatory provision (see T.J.D. Constr. Co. v City of New York, 295 AD2d 180 [2002]; S.N. Tannor, Inc. v A.F.C. Enters., 276 AD2d 363, 364 [2000]). Concur— Nardelli, J.P, Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Rosenberger and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hi-Tech Constr. & Mgt. Servs. Inc. v. Housing Auth. of the City of N.Y.
125 A.D.3d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Start Elevator, Inc. v. New York City Housing Authority
106 A.D.3d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Everest General Contractors v. New York City Housing Authority
99 A.D.3d 479 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
RIFENBURG CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
Rifenburg Construction, Inc. v. State
90 A.D.3d 1498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dormitory Authority-State
735 F. Supp. 2d 42 (S.D. New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 A.D.3d 128, 766 N.Y.S.2d 352, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bat-jac-contracting-inc-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-2003.