Baron Tube Co. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 432, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1911
United States Customs Court·Decided May 20, 1965·No. No. 69309; protest 299214-K (San Francisco)·Published
Opinion
[433]*433Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of seamless steel oil-well rejected casing, not advanced beyond hammering, rolling, or easting, similar in all material respects to that the subject of United Supply & Mfg. Co., The Crispin Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 95, C.D. 1804), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baron Tube Co. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 432, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1911 (cusc 1965).
54 Cust. Ct. 432 (Baron Tube Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United Supply & Mfg. Co. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 95 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)