Home/U.S. Customs Court/Baron Tube Co. v. United States

Baron Tube Co. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 432, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1911
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 20, 1965
DocketNo. 69309; protest 299214-K (San Francisco)
StatusPublished

This text of 54 Cust. Ct. 432 (Baron Tube Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baron Tube Co. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 432, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1911 (cusc 1965).

Opinion

[433]*433Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of seamless steel oil-well rejected casing, not advanced beyond hammering, rolling, or easting, similar in all material respects to that the subject of United Supply & Mfg. Co., The Crispin Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 95, C.D. 1804), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Supply & Mfg. Co. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 95 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Cust. Ct. 432, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baron-tube-co-v-united-states-cusc-1965.