Baron Tube Co. v. United States
This text of 48 Cust. Ct. 473 (Baron Tube Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of seamless steel oil-well casings, not advanced beyond hammering, rolling, or casting, similar in all material respects to those the subject of United Supply & Mfg. Co., The Crispin Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 95, C.D. 1804), the claim at one-tenth of 1 cent per pound was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of seamless steel oil-well casings, advanced beyond hammering, rolling, or casting, the same as those involved in Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al. v. United States (32 Cust. Ct. 32, C.D. 1577), were held dutiable at 7% percent ad valorem, as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 Cust. Ct. 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baron-tube-co-v-united-states-cusc-1962.