Home/U.S. Customs Court/Baron Tube Co. v. United States

Baron Tube Co. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 790
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 29, 1966
DocketNo. P66/136
StatusPublished

This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 790 (Baron Tube Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baron Tube Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 790 (cusc 1966).

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of seamless steel oil well casing, not advanced beyond hammering, rolling, or casting, the same in all material respects as that the subject of United Supply & Mfg. Co., The Crispin Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 95, C.D. 1804), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Supply & Mfg. Co. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 95 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Cust. Ct. 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baron-tube-co-v-united-states-cusc-1966.