Baron Tube Co. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 790
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of seamless steel oil well casing, not advanced beyond hammering, rolling, or casting, the same in all material respects as that the subject of United Supply & Mfg. Co., The Crispin Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 95, C.D. 1804), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baron Tube Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 790 (cusc 1966).
57 Cust. Ct. 790 (Baron Tube Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United Supply & Mfg. Co. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 95 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)