Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Barnet v. Horwitz

Barnet v. Horwitz

278 A.D. 700, 103 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4414
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 12, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 278 A.D. 700 (Barnet v. Horwitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnet v. Horwitz, 278 A.D. 700, 103 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

In an action to recover brokerage commissions, order of the County Court, Westchester County, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The counterclaim on its face does not set forth a cause of action and in any event no factual showing is made which would indicate that a triable issue exists. There is no dispute that plaintiff has earned his commission as a broker in the amount set forth in the complaint. The affidavit in opposition is made by an attorney who does not reveal personal knowledge of the facts. It is without probative value. (City Sav. Bank of Brooklyn V. Torro, 253 App. Div. 748, 749; Favole v. Gallo, 263 App. Div. 729.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LaSalle Bank N.A. v. Dono
45 Misc. 3d 537 (New York Supreme Court, 2014)
In re the Accounting of Watson
38 A.D.2d 259 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Robert N. Brown Associates Inc. v. Fileppo
38 A.D.2d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
French v. Colamaio
56 Misc. 2d 471 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
Yancy v. Gambee
54 Misc. 2d 743 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1967)
Israelson v. Rubin
20 A.D.2d 668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Dahlke v. Dunham
36 Misc. 2d 254 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Fauci v. Milano
15 A.D.2d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Gale v. Janco Taxi, Inc.
33 Misc. 2d 446 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Rundquist v. Rundquist
33 Misc. 2d 107 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Hochfelder v. Earl
22 Misc. 2d 665 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Gallo v. Schneider
22 Misc. 2d 672 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Varone v. Calarco
22 Misc. 2d 1085 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Sackstein v. Wechsler
9 A.D.2d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Behrens v. Shawmut Transportation Co.
22 Misc. 2d 892 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Di Sabato v. Soffes
9 A.D.2d 297 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Schwartz v. Sar Corp.
19 Misc. 2d 660 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Phelan v. Houghton
16 Misc. 2d 227 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 700, 103 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnet-v-horwitz-nyappdiv-1951.