Israelson v. Rubin

20 A.D.2d 668, 247 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4506
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 27, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 20 A.D.2d 668 (Israelson v. Rubin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Israelson v. Rubin, 20 A.D.2d 668, 247 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

In. an action to recover eobrokerage commissions (first and second causes of action) and compensation allegedly due under a contract of employment (third and fourth causes of action), plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated May 28, 1963, which denied his motion for partial summary judgment for the relief demanded in the third and fourth causes of action. Order reversed, without costs; action severed as to the first [669]*669and second causes of action; plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment granted; and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff upon the third and fourth causes of action alleged in the complaint. The third and fourth causes of action, whereby plaintiff seeks to recover the sums of $3,363.65 and $4,175,. respectively, are based upon agreements which are substantiated by plaintiff’s affidavit and, in part, by the defendant’s admissions. Plaintiff deposes that he fully executed his part of the agreements and that defendant made partial payments on account thereof, with respect to which documentary proof is offered. The affidavit of defendant’s attorney, the only paper submitted in opposition to the motion, contains bald conclusions without any evidentiary facts to substantiate a defense or to refute plaintiff’s claims. Since it does not appear that defendant’s attorney has any personal knowledge of the facts, his affidavit has no probative value and should be disregarded (Cohen v. Pannia, 7 A D 2d 886; Barnet v. Horwitz, 278 App. Div. 700). Defendant having failed to show either by his own affidavit or by the affidavit of a person with knowledge that he (the defendant) has a bona fide defense to the third and fourth causes of action, summary judgment should be granted to plaintiff thereon (CPLR 3212; Schillinger v. North Hills Realty Corp., 15 A D 2d 539, affd. 11 N Y 2d 1044; Kramer v. Harris, 9 A D 2d 282; Dwan v. Massarene, 199 App. Div. 872). Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

K - Detailing, Inc. v. N & C Ironworks, Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 33588(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Marinelli v. Shifrin
260 A.D.2d 227 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Shawy v. Bielefeld
254 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Adam v. Cutner
238 A.D.2d 234 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Oquendo v. City of New York
238 A.D.2d 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Galindez v. City of New York
232 A.D.2d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Skiadas v. Terovolas
219 A.D.2d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Goldberger v. Brick & Ballerstein, Inc.
217 A.D.2d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
In re Kaitlyn S.
148 Misc. 2d 276 (NYC Family Court, 1990)
Lucas v. Long Island Physicians Associates, P. C.
103 A.D.2d 841 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Forray v. New York Hospital
101 A.D.2d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Carr v. Carruth
85 A.D.2d 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
417 East Realty Associates v. Ryan
110 Misc. 2d 607 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1981)
Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
O'Connor v. B. J. Auto Make Ready Corp.
101 Misc. 2d 665 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1979)
Johnson v. Sharpe
66 A.D.2d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Andreano v. Testa
64 A.D.2d 1019 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Teddy's Drive-In, Inc. v. State
63 A.D.2d 1070 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Broughton v. City of New York
95 Misc. 2d 807 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Bruno v. Bruno
60 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 A.D.2d 668, 247 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/israelson-v-rubin-nyappdiv-1964.