Barker v. Butte Consolidated Mining Co.
215 U.S. 584, 30 S. Ct. 404, 54 L. Ed. 338, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1767
Opinion
Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Butte City Water Co. v. Baker, 196 U. S. 119; Haire v. Rice, 204 U. S. 291; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180; Moran v. Horsky, 178 U. S. 205; Beals v. Cone, 188 U. S. 184; Iowa v. Rood, 187 U. S. 87; Stuart v. Hauser, 203 U. S. 585; Gatewood v. North Carolina, 203 U. S. 531; Bachtel v. Wilson, 204 U. S. 36; Iowa Central Railway Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barker v. Butte Consolidated Mining Co., 215 U.S. 584, 30 S. Ct. 404, 54 L. Ed. 338, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1767 (1909).
215 U.S. 584 (Barker v. Butte Consolidated Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sayward v. Denny
158 U.S. 180 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Iowa Central Railway Co. v. Iowa
160 U.S. 389 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Moran v. Horsky
178 U.S. 205 (Supreme Court, 1900)
Iowa v. Rood
187 U.S. 87 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Beals v. Cone
188 U.S. 184 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Butte City Water Co. v. Baker
196 U.S. 119 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Gatewood v. North Carolina
203 U.S. 531 (Supreme Court, 1906)
Bachtel v. Wilson
204 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Montant Ex Rel. Haire v. Rice
204 U.S. 291 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Stuart v. Hauser
203 U.S. 585 (Supreme Court, 1906)