Barker v. Butte Consolidated Mining Co.

Supreme Court

Barker v. Butte Consolidated Mining Co.

215 U.S. 584, 30 S. Ct. 404, 54 L. Ed. 338, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1767

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 15, 1909

DocketNo. 32

StatusPublished

This text of 215 U.S. 584 (Barker v. Butte Consolidated Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barker v. Butte Consolidated Mining Co., 215 U.S. 584, 30 S. Ct. 404, 54 L. Ed. 338, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1767 (1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Butte City Water Co. v. Baker, 196 U. S. 119; Haire v. Rice, 204 U. S. 291; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180; Moran v. Horsky, 178 U. S. 205; Beals v. Cone, 188 U. S. 184; Iowa v. Rood, 187 U. S. 87; Stuart v. Hauser, 203 U. S. 585; Gatewood v. North Carolina, 203 U. S. 531; Bachtel v. Wilson, 204 U. S. 36; Iowa Central Railway Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Butte City Water Co. v. Baker, 196 U. S. 119; Haire v. Rice, 204 U. S. 291; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180; Moran v. Horsky, 178 U. S. 205; Beals v. Cone, 188 U. S. 184; Iowa v. Rood, 187 U. S. 87; Stuart v. Hauser, 203 U. S. 585; Gatewood v. North Carolina, 203 U. S. 531; Bachtel v. Wilson, 204 U. S. 36; Iowa Central Railway Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 U.S. 584, 30 S. Ct. 404, 54 L. Ed. 338, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-butte-consolidated-mining-co-scotus-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack