Stuart v. Hauser

203 U.S. 585, 27 S. Ct. 783, 51 L. Ed. 328, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1646
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 3, 1906·No. No. 60·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Swafford v. Templeton, 185 U. S. 487; Butler v. Gage, 138 U. S. 52; Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155; Erie Railroad Company v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148; Ansbro v. United States, 159 U. S. 695; Cornell v. Creen, 163 U. S. 75; Bausman v. Dixon, 173 U. S. 113; Gableman v. Peoria &c. Railway Company, 179 U. S. 335; City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Company, 142 U. S. 79; Beals v. Cone, 188 U. S. 184; Speed v. McCarthy, 181 U. S. 269. Case below, 9 Idaho, 53.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stuart v. Hauser, 203 U.S. 585, 27 S. Ct. 783, 51 L. Ed. 328, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1646 (1906).

203 U.S. 585 (Stuart v. Hauser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barker v. Butte Consolidated Mining Co.
215 U.S. 584 (Supreme Court, 1909)