Home/Supreme Court/Bachtel v. Wilson

Bachtel v. Wilson

204 U.S. 42, 27 S. Ct. 246
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 7, 1907
DocketNos. 447, 448, 449, 450
StatusPublished

This text of 204 U.S. 42 (Bachtel v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bachtel v. Wilson, 204 U.S. 42, 27 S. Ct. 246 (1907).

Opinion

204 U.S. 42 (1907)

BACHTEL
v.
WILSON, SHERIFF.
MILLER
v.
SAME.
DAVIS
v.
SAME.
VAN HORN
v.
SAME.

Nos. 447, 448, 449 and 450.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 14, 15, 1906.
Decided January 7, 1907.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO.

Mr. William A. Lynch for plaintiffs in error.[1]

Mr. Charles C. Upham and Mr. John W. Craine for defendant in error.[1]

MR. JUSTICE BREWER delivered the opinion of the court.

The same question controls these cases as the one just decided, and, for the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, they are

Dismissed.

NOTES

[1] For abstracts of arguments see ante, pp. 37, 38.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bachtel v. Wilson
204 U.S. 42 (Supreme Court, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 U.S. 42, 27 S. Ct. 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bachtel-v-wilson-scotus-1907.