Barfield v. State

900 So. 2d 723, 2005 WL 957182
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 2005·No. 3D04-1935·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

900 So.2d 723 (2005)

Willie BARFIELD, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D04-1935.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 27, 2005.

Willie Barfield, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, FLETCHER and WELLS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Willie Barfield appeals an order denying his motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) for credit for jail time served. The State concedes that, based on the present record, it appears that the defendant is entitled to additional credit. The wording of the trial court's order denying relief suggests (but does not clearly state) that there may have been a partial waiver of credit in connection with a plea bargain. If that is so, that showing may be made on remand. The plea transcript was not attached to the order of denial.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barfield v. State, 900 So. 2d 723, 2005 WL 957182 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

900 So. 2d 723 (Barfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
219 So. 3d 201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Dorn v. State
928 So. 2d 507 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Gurrola v. State
925 So. 2d 430 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Zelaya v. State
925 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Ivey v. State
920 So. 2d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Lundy v. State
912 So. 2d 671 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Lee v. State
907 So. 2d 1264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)