Ivey v. State
This text of 917 So. 2d 1042 (Ivey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Terry T. IVEY, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
*1043 Terry T. Ivey, Daytona Beach, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.
PALMER, J.
Terry Torenzo Ivey has filed a petition with this court seeking a belated appeal. He contends that he is entitled to receive a belated appeal because the trial court's order denying his motion to withdraw his plea did not advise him of his right to appeal and because he did not timely receive a copy of the order. With regard to Ivey's first contention, Ivey is not entitled to receive any relief because there is no requirement that an order denying a motion to withdraw a plea filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(l) must contain a notification of a right to appeal. As for Ivey's second contention, the record does support the claim that he did not timely receive a copy of the trial court's order so that he could file a timely notice of appeal. Defense counsel attempted to send Ivey a copy by Federal Express, but it was sent to the wrong prison facility. A copy of the order was also sent by the trial court but it was returned as undeliverable. Accordingly, Ivey is entitled to receive a belated appeal.
PETITION GRANTED.
GRIFFIN, J., and PETERSON, E., Senior Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
917 So. 2d 1042, 2006 WL 64439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivey-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.