Barber v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Barber v. State

948 S.W.2d 262, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1247, 1997 WL 374477

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 8, 1997·No. No. 71039·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Richard Barber, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Richard Barber, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Barber v. State, 948 S.W.2d 262, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1247, 1997 WL 374477 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

948 S.W.2d 262 (Barber v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.