Barber v. State
904 S.W.2d 34, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 959, 1995 WL 310731
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant, Richard Barber, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended [35]*35opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barber v. State, 904 S.W.2d 34, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 959, 1995 WL 310731 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
904 S.W.2d 34 (Barber v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.