Barber v. State

896 S.W.2d 656, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 471, 1995 WL 106477
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 14, 1995·No. No. 66597·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Christopher Barber, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the circuit court is not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barber v. State, 896 S.W.2d 656, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 471, 1995 WL 106477 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

896 S.W.2d 656 (Barber v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.