Barber v. State
562 So. 2d 445, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4461, 1990 WL 83619
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 21, 1990
DocketNo. 89-566
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 562 So. 2d 445 (Barber v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barber v. State, 562 So. 2d 445, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4461, 1990 WL 83619 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
We affirm. It was within the trial court’s discretion to refuse the defendant examination concerning an alleged prior inconsistent statement of the witness where it was made clear to the court in advance that counsel for the defendant would not offer evidence to prove the inconsistency.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Cape Canaveral v. Rich
562 So. 2d 445 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
562 So. 2d 445, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4461, 1990 WL 83619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barber-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.