Banks v. California
395 U.S. 708, 89 S. Ct. 1901, 23 L. Ed. 2d 653, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1264
Opinion
Petitioner did not ask the Supreme Court of California to review the judgment entered by the Court of Appeal in this case. Therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeal is not a “[fjinal judgment . . . rendered by the highest court of a State in which a decision could be had . . . 28 U. S. C. § 1257, and we lack jurisdiction to review it. The writ of certiorari is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Banks v. California, 395 U.S. 708, 89 S. Ct. 1901, 23 L. Ed. 2d 653, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1264 (1969).
395 U.S. 708 (Banks v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ben-Yah v. Norris
570 F. Supp. 2d 1086 (E.D. Arkansas, 2008)
Riddle v. Kemna
523 F.3d 850 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Donald Riddle v. Michael Kemna
Eighth Circuit, 2008
Albert Pierson v. Dave Dormire
Eighth Circuit, 2007
Albert L. Pierson v. Dave Dormire
484 F.3d 486 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
Gerard Joseph Pugh v. Hugh Smith
465 F.3d 1295 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Sandquist v. California
419 U.S. 1066 (Supreme Court, 1974)
In Re Banks
482 P.2d 215 (California Supreme Court, 1971)
In re Skolnick
396 U.S. 869 (Supreme Court, 1969)