Sandquist v. California

419 U.S. 1066, 95 S. Ct. 652, 42 L. Ed. 2d 662
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 16, 1974
DocketNo. 73-1739; No. 74-158; No. 74-159
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 419 U.S. 1066 (Sandquist v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sandquist v. California, 419 U.S. 1066, 95 S. Ct. 652, 42 L. Ed. 2d 662 (1974).

Opinion

App. Dept., Super Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles;

App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Santa Cruz. Petitioners did not seek to have the Appellate Department certify their cases to the Court of Appeal pursuant to California Penal Code § 1471 and California Rules of Court 62 and 63. Accordingly, the decisions of the Appellate Department are not “[f]inal judgments . . . rendered by the highest court of a State in which a decision could be had . . . ,” 28 U. S. C. § 1257, and the petitions for writs of certiorari to their respective courts are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Banks v. California, 395 U. S. 708 (1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gerard Joseph Pugh v. Hugh Smith
465 F.3d 1295 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
People v. Kuhns
61 Cal. App. 3d 735 (California Court of Appeal, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 U.S. 1066, 95 S. Ct. 652, 42 L. Ed. 2d 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandquist-v-california-scotus-1974.