Banks v. California

382 U.S. 420, 86 S. Ct. 622, 15 L. Ed. 2d 499, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2419
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 24, 1966
Docket87, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 382 U.S. 420 (Banks v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Banks v. California, 382 U.S. 420, 86 S. Ct. 622, 15 L. Ed. 2d 499, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2419 (1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, for further proceedings in light of Griffin v. California, 380 U. S. 609.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration of this motion and petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John A. Hutter Et Ux. v. Bernard J. Korzen, Etc
409 U.S. 905 (Supreme Court, 1972)
In Re Banks
482 P.2d 215 (California Supreme Court, 1971)
Garvey v. State
424 P.2d 206 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
382 U.S. 420, 86 S. Ct. 622, 15 L. Ed. 2d 499, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-california-scotus-1966.