Balet v. Dávila
This text of 44 P.R. 49 (Balet v. Dávila) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered tlie opinion of the Court.
This is a summary foreclosure proceeding instituted in. October 1930, under the Mortgage Law and the Regulations, in order to foreclose a mortgage which also secured the payment of a fixed amount for costs and attorney’s fees. On. the 10th of November following, the court ordered that-demand be made on the defendant for payment of the principal due, the unpaid interest thereon, and the sum stipulated for costs and attorney’s fees,, and such demand was made accordingly. Three days before, this Court decided in the cases of Vidal Sánches v. Corte, 40 P.R.R. 100, that costs must be taxed in proceedings of this nature; and on June 5, 1931, the foredosing creditor filed a memorandum of costs which was challenged by the debtor and approved by the court, on July 21, 1931, after making a certain reduction in the amount thereof. The debtor took an appeal from that decision, and the hearing before us was held on the 17th of the current month and year.
As a ground for his appeal, the appellant urges that the memorandum of costs should have been presented within the ten days following the demand for payment.
[50]*50Tlie case of Arsuaga v. Corte, 43 P.R.R.-,
Note : See Preface of this volume.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 P.R. 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balet-v-davila-prsupreme-1932.