Baker v. State

211 So. 2d 59, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5425
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 1968·No. No. 67-451·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only point preserved for review on this appeal is the question of the “voluntariness” of a statement given by the appellant.

From the record, it appears that counsel for the appellant [defendant in the trial court] conceded that the statement was given voluntarily. Therefore, we find the point not to be well taken on this appeal. Compare: Morgan v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 60; State v. Jones, Fla.1967, 204 So.2d 515; Colebrook v. State, Fla.App.1968, 205 So.2d 675; Grace v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 225; Harris v. State, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 108; DeRiggi v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So.2d 714 [opinion filed April 30, 1968],

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 211 So. 2d 59, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5425 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

211 So. 2d 59 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Escobedo v. State
561 So. 2d 429 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Britt v. State
211 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)