Baker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Baker v. State

188 So. 2d 346, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5073

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 1966·No. No. 65-932·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While serving sentence imposed for certain felonies as to which the appellant had pleaded guilty, he moved to vacate the judgment and sentences, under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix-After an evidentiary hearing thereon the motion was denied, and the defendant appealed. We affirm the trial judge’s order denying the motion under Criminal Procedure Rule 1. A defendant’s reliance on his retained attorney’s expression of belief that a plea of guilty will result in leniency is not ground for collateral attack, under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, of an adjudication of guilt entered on such plea. Williams v. State, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 775; Manning v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 380.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

While serving sentence imposed for certain felonies as to which the appellant had pleaded guilty, he moved to vacate the judgment and sentences, under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix-After an evidentiary hearing thereon the motion was denied, and the defendant appealed. We affirm the trial judge’s order denying the motion under Criminal Procedure Rule 1. A defendant’s reliance on his retained attorney’s expression of belief that a plea of guilty will result in leniency is not ground for collateral attack, under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, of an adjudication of guilt entered on such plea. Williams v. State, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 775; Manning v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 380.

Affirmed.

Baker v. State, 188 So. 2d 346, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5073 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

188 So. 2d 346 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related