Bailey v. State

1930 OK CR 259, 288 P. 991, 48 Okla. Crim. 21, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 5
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bailey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Okla. Crim. 159
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 5, 1930·No. No. A-7531.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of having possession of intoxicating liquor, in the county court of Noble county, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $300 and costs and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 60 days.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 30th day of August, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error and no appearance made for oral argument. We have carefully examined the record and find that the information properly charged an offense; that the defendant was accorded a fair and impartial trial. No errors being apparent depriving the appellant of any substantial right, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. State, 1930 OK CR 259, 288 P. 991, 48 Okla. Crim. 21, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 5 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

1930 OK CR 259 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.