Bailey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bailey v. State

1929 OK CR 300, 279 P. 913, 44 Okla. Crim. 76, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 21

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 27, 1929

DocketNo. A-6669.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 300 (Bailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. State, 1929 OK CR 300, 279 P. 913, 44 Okla. Crim. 76, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 21 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Payne county on a charge of selling” intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of-' flOO and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal was lodged in this court June 9, 1927, and plaintiff in error was at large .upon an appeal bond. The Attorney General has filed a motion in this court, supported by the affidavits of H. H. Isham, sheriff of Noble county, and of A. D. Williams, undersheriff of Payne county, and John B. Calderhead, former sheriff of Payne county, that the plaintiff in error is now a fugitive from justice and without the jurisdiction of this court.

It has been uniformly held by this court that, where a person is convicted of a crime, and has prosecuted an appeal to this court, and thereafter becomes a fugitive from justice, or is otherwise beyond the jurisdiction of this' court, and cannot be made to respond to any judgment or order that might be made in this case, the appeal will be dismissed.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI