Bailey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bailey v. State

1930 OK CR 259, 288 P. 991, 48 Okla. Crim. 21, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 5

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 5, 1930

DocketNo. A-7531.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 259 (Bailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. State, 1930 OK CR 259, 288 P. 991, 48 Okla. Crim. 21, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 5 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of having possession of intoxicating liquor, in the county court of Noble county, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $300 and costs and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 60 days.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 30th day of August, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error and no appearance made for oral argument. We have carefully examined the record and find that the information properly charged an offense; that the defendant was accorded a fair and impartial trial. No errors being apparent depriving the appellant of any substantial right, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of having possession of intoxicating liquor, in the county court of Noble county, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $300 and costs and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 60 days.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 30th day of August, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error and no appearance made for oral argument. We have carefully examined the record and find that the information properly charged an offense; that the defendant was accorded a fair and impartial trial. No errors being apparent depriving the appellant of any substantial right, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 259, 288 P. 991, 48 Okla. Crim. 21, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.