Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State

245 So. 3d 1015
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 20, 2018·No. No. 1D18–1466·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Landmark at Crescent Ridge LP v. Everest Fin., Inc., 219 So.3d 218, 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (explaining that where the threshold requirement of irreparable harm is not established, the petition for writ of certiorari must be dismissed).

Wolf, Jay, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. State, 245 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

245 So. 3d 1015 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gerald Francis Bott v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
Bott v. State
275 So. 3d 844 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Rahming v. Fla. Comm'n On Offender Review
263 So. 3d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Ulm v. Fla. Comm'n On Offender Review
263 So. 3d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Robert Ulm v. Florida Commission On Offender Review
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
Jonathan Rahming v. Florida Commission On Offender Review
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019