Jonathan Rahming v. Florida Commission On Offender Review

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jonathan Rahming v. Florida Commission On Offender Review

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 5, 2019

Docket18-4840

StatusPublished

This text of Jonathan Rahming v. Florida Commission On Offender Review (Jonathan Rahming v. Florida Commission On Offender Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jonathan Rahming v. Florida Commission On Offender Review, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D18-4840 _____________________________

JONATHAN RAHMING,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

February 5, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Because Petitioner has not shown irreparable harm, we dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari for lack of jurisdiction. See Bailey v. State, 245 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Jonathan Rahming, pro se, Petitioner.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI