Robert Ulm v. Florida Commission On Offender Review
This text of Robert Ulm v. Florida Commission On Offender Review (Robert Ulm v. Florida Commission On Offender Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-4792 _____________________________
ROBERT ULM,
Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
February 5, 2019
PER CURIAM.
Because Petitioner has not shown irreparable harm, we dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari for lack of jurisdiction. See Bailey v. State, 245 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).
WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Robert Ulm, pro se, Petitioner.
Rana Wallace, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Ulm v. Florida Commission On Offender Review, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-ulm-v-florida-commission-on-offender-review-fladistctapp-2019.